TV·22 Sep 2025
TV · RETROSPECTIVE

Squid Game Season 2: Hwang Dong-hyuk and the Insurrection Inside the Tournament

Three and a bit years after the first season, Hwang Dong-hyuk's second Squid Game is a structurally different object from the original, and the difference is the thing worth describing.

Written by Priya Nair, TV & Culture Editor··7 min read·TV
A green tracksuit folded neatly on a metal bunk, a white numbered square on the chest.
TV · RETROSPECTIVE
Squid Game Season 2: Hwang Dong-hyuk and the Insurrection Inside the Tournament

Poster / promotional material via Wikipedia, Squid Game. Used under fair use for criticism and review.

TV·7 MIN READ

Netflix released Squid Game Season 2 on the 26th of December 2024, three years and three months after the first season had become, by the platform’s reported viewing metrics, the most-watched Netflix original to that point. The first season’s success had been, for the platform, a specific kind of surprise: a Korean-language series that reached global cultural saturation without the localisation machinery American content typically relies on. The second season arrived as a scheduled event. Hwang Dong-hyuk, the creator and sole writer-director, returned with a seven-episode continuation and a third season already in production for 2025 release.

I want to describe what Hwang has done with the second season, because the reception has been mixed in a way that I think is partly about the thing he is actually doing and partly about the thing audiences arrived expecting.

What the season is

Seong Gi-hun (Lee Jung-jae), the first season’s winner, has spent the intervening three years not spending his prize money. He has been trying, from the outside, to identify and dismantle the organisation that runs the games. The second season opens with him close to giving up. A specific encounter in a subway station puts him back into contact with the recruiter (played by Gong Yoo in a role reprised from the first season’s opening). Gi-hun’s pursuit of the recruiter leads him, by choice this time, back into the games.

This is the season’s central structural reversal. Gi-hun is no longer a desperate contestant. He is a returning winner who has voluntarily entered the games to destroy them from inside. The other contestants, roughly 450 of them, are new. A few specific figures emerge: a young mother (Kang Ae-shim) entering the games to save her son’s life, a transgender woman (Park Sung-hoon) whose inclusion is one of the season’s more deliberate political choices, a former Marine (Yim Si-wan), a rapper-turned-gambler (T.O.P).

The Front Man (Lee Byung-hun) returns, and in a decision the season’s first critics flagged as a risk, enters the games himself under an assumed identity. This is the season’s second structural bet. Two characters the audience knows, from opposite sides of the game’s architecture, are now inside it simultaneously, neither aware of the other’s true position.

The structural difference

The first season was, by design, a contained competition narrative. A large cast is introduced. The cast is narrowed through specific elimination events. A winner is declared. The narrative engine is the tournament.

The second season is not a tournament. It is, more accurately, an attempted insurrection inside a tournament, and the structural difference changes the show’s specific register entirely. Gi-hun, knowing the games, is not playing to win. He is trying to organise the contestants into a collective refusal. The second season’s specific dramatic material is the politics of that organising effort: who will join Gi-hun, who will hold out, who will inform, who will defect, what happens when the majority vote at the end of each round is no longer a referendum on individual survival but a referendum on whether to continue the games at all.

This is, I think, what has divided the reception. Viewers who arrived expecting the first season’s competition-narrative register are receiving, instead, a show about collective political action under conditions of engineered scarcity. The new register is less immediately propulsive than the tournament was, but it is the register Hwang is, evidently, more interested in.

The voting mechanism

The season’s most specific structural innovation is the vote. After each round, the surviving contestants vote on whether to continue the games. A majority to end the games means everyone leaves with the prize money accumulated so far, divided among the survivors. A majority to continue means the games proceed.

The vote is the season’s engine. Gi-hun’s insurrection has to be conducted at the voting station, not in the game rooms. He has to persuade a majority of contestants, across multiple rounds, that continuation is not in their interest. The operators of the games have to engineer, across the same rounds, the specific conditions under which a majority will continue to vote to play.

What Hwang is staging is a political-science experiment. Under what conditions will a population subject to specific scarcity and specific asymmetric information vote to continue a system that is demonstrably killing them? The answer the show provides, across the seven episodes, is that they will continue to vote for continuation so long as the operators successfully calibrate the specific threshold at which the remaining prize money looks preferable to the risk of further rounds. This is not a subtle allegory. It is, on the contrary, specifically legible as a commentary on the political economies of contemporary late capitalism.

Lee Jung-jae’s second register

Lee Jung-jae’s Gi-hun is a different performance from the first season. The first-season Gi-hun was a specifically desperate man who discovered, over the course of the games, his own capacity for cruelty. The second-season Gi-hun has spent three years living with what he did in the first season, and he is, visibly, a different person for it.

Lee plays the specific physical tension of a man who has been carrying guilt at maximum volume for three years. His Gi-hun moves differently. He speaks more slowly. He is harder to read. The specific register is unfamiliar, because leading-man performances in long-running television typically return to an audience-familiar baseline between seasons. Lee has refused that. The Gi-hun of Season 2 is, formally, a continuation rather than a reset.

Lee Byung-hun’s infiltration

The Front Man’s decision to enter the games is the season’s most divisive narrative choice. I want to defend it. Lee Byung-hun is playing a character whose specific institutional role is to maintain the games’ integrity from a position of authority. His decision to enter the arena disguised as a contestant is, narratively, a choice to test whether the system he administers can withstand the insurrection Gi-hun is attempting.

What Lee Byung-hun plays, across the season, is a specific kind of managerial curiosity: a man who wants to see the machinery he oversees work from the inside, who is willing to enter the risk to confirm the specific operations of his own design. The scenes between Lee Byung-hun and Lee Jung-jae, when they occur, carry the entire dramatic weight the season accumulates. Both actors are working at the specific register of men who are each in possession of a secret the other one does not know, and the tension is absorbing.

The cinematography and the games

Lee Hyung-deok returns as the director of photography. The production design, by Chae Kyoung-sun, continues the first season’s pastel-geometric register with an expanded palette. The games this season are, on balance, less iconic than the first season’s. No single round reaches the cultural penetration of Red Light Green Light or the glass bridge. What the new games are, though, is more structurally interesting: each is calibrated more tightly to the voting-and-coalition dynamics Hwang is staging. The games are less dramatically memorable but more narratively integrated.

The ending and the third season

The season ends at a specific structural midpoint. Gi-hun’s insurrection has not succeeded. The games are continuing. A third season has been confirmed for 2025 release. The ending is not a cliffhanger in the conventional sense; it is, instead, an unresolved middle, and the show is asking its audience to accept that the second season is the middle third of a three-season structure rather than a standalone arc.

This is a risk. Netflix audiences are accustomed to seasons that resolve. The second season’s deliberate refusal to resolve will frustrate some viewers and reward others. My expectation is that the show’s final judgement will depend substantially on what the third season does with the setup, and I am willing to wait to make it.

Watch the second season twice if you can. The first viewing will feel different from the first season. The second viewing, knowing what the show is now doing, will let the specific political and structural work land at the register Hwang intended. The show is quieter than it was. The quieter register is the point.

WRITTEN BY
Priya Nair
TV & CULTURE EDITOR

Priya came to criticism sideways from theatre. She is patient with slow shows, short with bloated ones, and cheerfully vicious about lazy writing.

MORE BY PRIYA NAIR
KEEP READING