TV·22 Aug 2024
TV · RETROSPECTIVE

House of the Dragon Season 2: The Momentum Problem

House of the Dragon's second season ended earlier this month. After eight episodes that often circled material without advancing it, the season is a specific diagnostic.

Written by Priya Nair, TV & Culture Editor··5 min read·TV
Stone castle battlements in grey storm light above a misty landscape
TV · RETROSPECTIVE
House of the Dragon Season 2: The Momentum Problem

Poster / promotional material via Wikipedia, House of the Dragon. Used under fair use for criticism and review.

TV·5 MIN READ

House of the Dragon Season 2 finished airing on HBO earlier in August. I have watched the full season twice now, the second time specifically to test whether my first-viewing dissatisfaction was a function of release-schedule fatigue (HBO releases episodes weekly, and the show’s political complications reward binging) or a function of the season itself.

The dissatisfaction survived the rewatch. Season 2 is not a bad television season. It is, however, a specifically compromised one, and the compromise is worth articulating because it is the compromise that breaks most serialised fantasy adaptations at this stage of their run.

What the season was asked to do

Season 1 of House of the Dragon (2022) ended with Rhaenyra Targaryen’s son Lucerys being killed by Aemond Targaryen, the inciting act of the Targaryen civil war known as the Dance of the Dragons. Season 2’s task was to stage the opening phase of that war across eight episodes, covering roughly the first year of the historical conflict as depicted in George R. R. Martin’s Fire & Blood.

The source material, at this point in the story, is structurally difficult. Fire & Blood is written as a historical chronicle compressing years of action into paragraph-level summary. The showrunners (Ryan Condal, Sara Hess, and the writing room) have to expand this source material across multiple episodes of television, inventing specific scene-level drama, dialogue, and character interaction that the chronicle does not provide.

This expansion is where Season 2 falters.

The specific problem

What the season does, across its eight episodes, is essentially stage the same scene three or four times. Rhaenyra on Dragonstone, working out whether to attempt negotiation or pursue open war. Alicent on King’s Landing, working out whether her side is capable of the war she has committed to. A council meeting. A private conversation between two characters. Another council meeting. Another private conversation.

These scenes are, individually, often well-written. The performances (Emma D’Arcy as Rhaenyra, Olivia Cooke as Alicent, Matt Smith as Daemon, Ewan Mitchell as Aemond) are strong. The production values are superb.

The cumulative effect, across the season, is that the conflict stops advancing. The war that the season is theoretically about does not, in most of its episodes, actually happen. The characters keep discussing what they will do without doing it. The dragons, the season’s most expensive production element, appear in only a handful of sequences, each of which is genuinely impressive but which the season spaces out across its running time with a specific economy that reads as restraint rather than as narrative necessity.

The D’Arcy problem

Emma D’Arcy’s Rhaenyra is, at this point, one of the most interesting-cast leads in contemporary fantasy television. D’Arcy brings a specific androgynous watchfulness to the role that is very different from the more conventionally-heroic register the Game of Thrones television universe has historically preferred.

The problem for D’Arcy this season is that Rhaenyra is, structurally, the character who most needs to make decisive moves, and the season repeatedly stops short of letting her make them. She agonises. She deliberates. She is dissuaded by advisors. She is dissuaded again. The character’s specific political paralysis is, in the source material, a real historical-fiction element (Rhaenyra in Fire & Blood is ambivalent about violence at specifically the wrong moments), but the show’s extended focus on that ambivalence reads, across multiple episodes, as a scriptwriting problem rather than a characterisation one.

The Rook’s Rest

The season has one genuinely extraordinary sequence: the Battle of Rook’s Rest, in episode four. The sequence features three dragons in aerial combat, staged with a specific clarity and spatial coherence that the rest of the season does not match. The fight is brutal. The choreography is legible. The emotional fallout is earned.

For the length of that sequence, the show is doing what the season as a whole should have been doing. The rest of the season, unfortunately, treats Rook’s Rest as a one-time exception rather than as a template.

Ewan Mitchell, the supporting anchor

Ewan Mitchell’s Aemond Targaryen is the performance the season is quietly built around. Aemond has become, across the season, the show’s most formally interesting character: specifically committed, specifically damaged, specifically capable of violence that the other characters keep talking about and failing to execute.

Mitchell plays Aemond at a specific register of quiet menace that is genuinely unnerving. The scene in episode three, in which Aemond interacts with his brother Aegon (Tom Glynn-Carney) at court, is the season’s best character moment, and Mitchell carries it.

Where the season leaves the show

The finale, which I will not spoil in detail, ends on a setup for a larger-scale conflict rather than on a climactic dramatic beat. This is the season’s most-criticised specific choice. Critics (and viewers) had, I think reasonably, expected the season to culminate in a major engagement. It does not. The final episode sets up future engagements, and viewers are asked to wait for Season 3 (currently scheduled for 2026) to see them.

This is defensible as a structural choice but commercially precarious. Prestige television audiences have, across the last five years, become increasingly impatient with shows that defer their climaxes. House of the Dragon is asking for two more years of viewer patience on the promise of a payoff the show has not yet demonstrated it can deliver.

What the show needs to do

If Season 3 is to recover the momentum that Season 2 lost, it will need to let the war actually happen. The show has established the political stakes at length across two seasons. It now needs to stage the consequences.

I am cautiously hopeful. The production infrastructure is in place. The cast is strong. The source material has, from this point forward, genuinely extraordinary sequences that cry out for television adaptation. The risk is that the showrunners continue to over-weight deliberation and under-weight action.

Watch Season 2 for the performances, the Rook’s Rest sequence, and the production design. Manage your expectations about plot advancement. Hope, with me, for Season 3.

WRITTEN BY
Priya Nair
TV & CULTURE EDITOR

Priya came to criticism sideways from theatre. She is patient with slow shows, short with bloated ones, and cheerfully vicious about lazy writing.

MORE BY PRIYA NAIR
KEEP READING